Shaheim Henry, Author at The Gradient Group | Page 2 of 3

This story originally appeared on Calendar

Every week, over 100 million consumers tune in to their favorite podcasts. Some are casual listeners. Others avidly fill their queues with so many episodes and interviews that they’ll never work through them all. The growing number of online audio listeners represents a new consumer segment that businesses are increasingly targeting with their marketing messages. However, to date, there have been significant barriers to entry in the audio advertising space. Factors such as limited bandwidth, creative resources, and restrictive budgets have prevented smaller businesses from participating in the audio market.

AudioGO, a part of SiriusXM, has rewritten the script for advertising on podcasts and similar online audio channels. AudioGO’s innovative platform disrupts the market. It achieves this by making podcast advertising accessible to anyone, including those with small teams and limited marketing budgets.

In this article, we’ll explore how AudioGO democratizes digital audio advertising, making it easier than ever for small businesses, including niche and local enterprises, to amplify their message, reach their target audiences, and compete with larger brands.

Small Business Marketing Pressures and Opportunities in 2025

The rise of online listeners is staggering. In 2023, 75% of Americans 12 and older had listened to online audio content within the past month. Even more impressive is that 70% of these individuals had done so within the past week. For some context, monthly listeners were 8% in 2003.

People are tuning in to online audio more often and in greater numbers. The mass migration of tens of millions of listeners into the audio space has created a lucrative marketing opportunity. It helps businesses looking to reach consumers with their products and services.

The question is, how can they do so? Advertisements and sponsorships are obvious options, but how do those happen behind the scenes? Besides, while people are listening, is it a safe bet to assume they’ll pay attention to promotional content if you get an ad into a podcast?

To answer the second question first, you have to find the right crowd. They are likely to be hyper-tuned to what you have to say. Edison Research calls those who listen to podcasts voraciously (an average of 11.2 hours per week) Super Listeners. Half of those surveyed reported that podcast messaging is the best way for brands to connect with them. Even more of them said they pay closer attention to podcast advertisements. They claim to be more likely to patronize a brand if it advertises on a show they like.

People are flocking to audio as a preferred form of content. They are willing to accept advertisements as part of the audio experience. That means companies have a strong chance of reaching and resonating with target audiences through podcasts and similar online audio outlets.

Small Business Barriers in Audio Advertising

This still leaves the first question — and unfortunately, it’s a logistical, administrative, and financial conundrum that keeps many entrepreneurs up at night. So, how can small businesses effectively reach their target audiences with limited budgets and small teams?

Running a single 30-second podcast ad in 2024 averaged around $18 per thousand listeners. Sounds fine, right? At scale, however, this can become incredibly expensive, and scale has been the primary driver of this industry’s operations so far. Many traditional podcast advertising packages start with minimums of $5,000 per campaign. Some set the bar at $25,000 per quarter.

This is where AudioGO is shifting the tone and giving small businesses a voice in the audio advertising space.

AudioGO: Accessible Audio Advertising for Entrepreneurs

Firstly, AudioGO empowers small businesses to reach engaged listeners without the high costs or complexity of traditional ad buying. The all-in-one platform provides a robust self-service experience, enabling businesses of any size to create, target, and launch professional audio ads on major streaming services. From this platform, you can launch podcast ad campaigns across today’s top podcast players. This includes Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and iHeartRadio, and gives you access to millions of engaged listeners.

Creating and distributing ads is essential to true accessibility in this key area of modern marketing. The process of audio advertising includes several steps. Some of these are hard to see until you’re in the middle of a campaign. They include:

  • Firstly, identifying a target audience: There are millions of listeners tuning in, and understanding which of those are best for lead generation is critical. The first step in a successful campaign is understanding your target audience members and identifying the shows where they tend to tune in.
  • Creating the ads themselves: This includes the ability to craft a compelling script, stick to the right amount of time (30 seconds? 60 seconds?), attract a listener’s attention, and weave a compelling call to action into the mix. You also need to consider factors such as brand voice and tone, copy, messaging, relevance, and more.
  • Paying for and timing ads: Finding the right placements on shows that are willing to work with you takes a lot of legwork. You must also decide whether it’s worth paying for premiums, like a mid-roll ad placement.
  • Finally, analyzing, understanding, and improving: You need to know if your audio ads are working, and if not, where to make adjustments. The ability to measure a campaign, observe the results, and synthesize them enough to create meaningful takeaways is essential to ongoing ad success.

AudioGO’s comprehensive approach and intuitive tools address all four of these areas:

  • Targeting your audience: AudioGO has hundreds of audience parameters, including age, gender, location, device, and show topic. This precise audience targeting enables small businesses to build highly focused audiences, ensuring that every ad that plays has an optimal chance of generating a lead.
  • Automating ad creation: The platform’s creative tools are designed to fill skill gaps. One of these is hiring creatives. Businesses can pay $10 for a studio recording of their ads made from a stable of real voice actors who work with AudioGO. They can also utilize a free, on-demand AI-generated ad creation tool to reduce costs further.
  • Matching budget to campaign: AudioGO’s flexible budgeting feature enables small businesses to launch high-quality ad campaigns for as little as $250. This low threshold eliminates the barrier of ad package pricing and creates a level playing field for companies at every level.
  • Analyzing and improving: Advanced reporting features provide real-time feedback in a user-friendly dashboard. This empowers non-analytical professionals to understand a campaign’s impact, identify who is listening, and make data-driven adjustments.

AudioGO: Small Business Advertising Made Simple

All in all, every aspect of AudioGO’s platform is designed with equity in mind. Its creators understand the inefficiencies and barriers that giant ad packages create. They also realize that this naturally keeps millions of small businesses on the outside looking in.

Finally, by streamlining ad creation and analysis, enabling precise targeting, and lowering minimum campaign spend, AudioGO has created an accessible, low-cost, high-value advertising option. Platforms like these provide small businesses with access to a cutting-edge area of consumer technology that shows no signs of slowing down anytime soon.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Austin Distel; Unsplash; Thanks!

Move sends shock waves through traditional media industry by posing threat to advertising agencies

The owner of Facebook and Instagram is to help advertisers to fully create and target campaigns using artificial intelligence tools by the end of next year, in a move that sent shock waves through the traditional marketing industry.

Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta, which also owns WhatsApp, aims to directly target brands’ marketing budgets, posing a threat to the advertising and media agencies that handle client campaigns and budgets.

The AI tools under development, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, will allow brands using Meta’s advertising platform to create ads using a product image and a planned marketing spend.

Woman holds iphone with icons of social media facebook, instagram, twitter, google application
What to do if you can’t get into your Facebook or Instagram account
Read more

Meta’s platform already offers some AI tools that allow advertisers to tweak existing ads before they appear on Facebook and Instagram.

However, the new tools could disintermediate the traditional advertising creation, planning and buying roles played by agencies, as well as open up a long tail of advertisers with small budgets that cannot afford to retain marketing services companies.

The AI tools would create the entire ad – including imagery, video and text – and also target it to users in line with a client’s budget.

Targeting such as geolocation would enable an advertisement for a holiday company, for example, to be tailored to offer deals specifically related to users’ likely destinations of interest.

Investors quickly sold off some of the world’s largest marketing services as news of Meta’s planned AI rollout, which could significantly swell the $160bn (£118bn) the company already makes annually from advertising, emerged on Monday.

Shares in WPP dropped 3% in early trading, while the French companies Publicis Groupe and Havas suffered 3.9% and 3% falls respectively.

Zuckerberg, who is heavily focused on driving AI-powered advertising, has referred to the development of new tools as “a redefinition of the category of advertising”.

In April, Meta updated its outlook on spending for the next year with plans to invest between $64bn and $72bn in capital expenditure, including the cost of building out AI infrastructure.

Marketers, it’s time to rethink how to use it effectively

AI is showing up everywhere, but that doesn’t mean it’s doing everything. Or doing everything well.

Today, it seems like every platform is calling itself AI-powered. Every deck has a line about embracing machine learning. But most of what gets labeled “AI” in advertising or marketing is just automation with better branding. You’re not seeing real intelligence.

You’re seeing shortcuts: faster guesses, templated content, performance theater. Think of programmatic ad buys that automatically optimize toward the cheapest inventory just because it gets clicks. The AI isn’t thinking about brand safety or context. It’s just reacting.

The popular pitch is always the same: “AI will fix everything. Target better. Write faster. Convert more.” However, if what you feed it isn’t grounded in reality and supported with real conversions and actual decisions, you’re not building intelligence. You’re just speeding up potential mistakes.

Where AI needs our help

AI is getting better. It can flag patterns, hint at intent, and suggest what might happen next. That’s progress. But it’s still guessing.

Models confuse activity with intent all the time. A click gets counted as engagement. A fast scroll looks like interest. CTV impressions, bot traffic, and accidental taps all get tallied without understanding what actually matters.

That’s why smart marketers don’t let the machine make the call. The focus should be on using real outcomes, customer insight, and proven behavior to keep AI focused on what works. If you’re not steering it, you’re letting it drift.

And drift leads to wasted spend, bad assumptions, and missed opportunities.

AI’s real job—enhance, not replace

Smarter teams aren’t asking AI to figure it out. They’re using it to scale what already works.

Start with outcomes. Feed it conversion data and real-time behavior, not assumptions. If you know what’s working, AI should be helping you become faster and more efficient. That’s it.

Too many brands use AI to guess their audience. They build lookalikes and spray messages across platforms. We’ve seen campaigns that lean on AI to identify in-market shoppers, only to serve ads to people who’ve already converted. The model’s chasing patterns, not context. Reach goes up. Relevance disappears. Impressions don’t convert. Costs climb. Nobody stops to ask why.

AI isn’t your strategist. It’s your engine. If you hand it a flawed plan, it won’t fix it, but it will get you to the wrong place faster.

How to use it right

AI works best when it’s reinforcing proven results. That means data tied to outcomes, not impressions.

If you know what’s driving performance, AI can help you do it faster. If you don’t, it will just amplify the noise. It’s not here to fix broken strategies. It’s here to extend experience and good judgment.

People still matter, possibly more than ever

AI can write copy, but that doesn’t mean it’s good copy.

It doesn’t know your brand. It doesn’t know your customers. You do. If you don’t, that’s your real problem.

AI won’t tell you when your tone is off, when your timing is wrong, or when the message feels disconnected. It doesn’t get context. It doesn’t know when a line sounds forced or when the audience stops trusting what you’re saying.

Someone still needs to make the call on what fits, what hits, and what fails. AI can’t feel friction. It can’t hear what people aren’t saying. That’s where good marketing lives.

The best work is coming from the people who understand AI as a tool, not those handing over control and hoping the model knows what to do with it. For Stirista, that means helping clients understand their unique customer segments and the nuance that makes messaging resonate authentically.

Where the industry goes from here

AI isn’t the future of marketing or advertising. Smarter marketers are.

The winning edge won’t come from the model. It will come from the data behind it and the people steering the output. The winners aren’t the ones with the flashiest demos. They are the ones turning smart use of AI into actual results.

This isn’t about becoming an AI company. It’s about being a better marketing company that knows when to lead and when to let the tools follow. It’s about being—or partnering with—a company focused on building a smarter marketing ecosystem where AI is a valuable tool within a broader strategy guided by data integrity and human insight.

Ask better questions. Pay attention to what you’re feeding the machine. If you’re not thinking clearly, AI won’t fix it. It will just help you fail faster.

Mike Hilts oversees Stirista’s product innovation and development, ensuring the company’s offerings remain at the forefront of the industry. With extensive experience in product management and a deep understanding of the adtech landscape, Hilts focuses on delivering solutions that combine cutting-edge technology with user-friendly functionality.

The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) has officially released its updated General Terms for Digital Advertising Agreements—and the organization is opening a 60-day public comment period until July 21, 2025.

The IAB standard terms and conditions (T&Cs) were originally created in May 2001, but according to the company, digital advertising media buys have not kept up with changes in technology, transaction types, or platform capabilities, which has led to legal burdens, slowed the process, and resulted in more complex negotiations.

According to IAB, the 3.0 version of T&Cs has been in market since 2010, while the terms for Coredge and lead gen, as well as video, have been used in market since around 2015.

“This is an opportunity for the broader IAB community and the digital ad industry to address the tremendous changes that have happened in the digital advertising landscape since then,” Michael Hahn, evp and general counsel, IAB and IAB Tech Lab, told ADWEEK. “In light of that changing landscape, there are a lot more different parts of the distribution chain than previously existed.”

 

The new and clearer foundation for digital ad transactions means buys can happen quicker and with less hassle, whether through direct buy or programmatic buying. The terms also aim to provide easier engagement with different vendors to support digital ad transactions, like measurement and ad verification providers.

“What we’re trying to address is a more holistic and broader set of relationships that exists in the digital ad distribution chain,” Hahn said. “There are certain things that you see over and over again in contracts—and can we standardize around a core set of terms and then create modularity and different addendums that address different types of deals that build on top of that?”

According to Angelina Eng, vp, measurement, addressability & data center, IAB, the company is aware that there are certain aspects, like the number of days of a certain term, that require flexibility.

“We’ve incorporated the opportunity to put together some scenarios of different timings of certain things and when they need to be delivered—and offer a set of flexibilities so that companies don’t have to be so rigid,” Eng said. “There is the option to select a different number of days for different types of deals and contracts.”

Updated terms for efficient transactions

The updated terms were worked on for over a year by 276 IAB member companies, including major holding companies like Omnicom and Publicis, as well as independent agencies such as Butler/Till and Canvas Worldwide, brands like Unilever and Bayer, and media publishers like Hearst and NBCUniversal, top ad tech firms, and law firms.

These terms are meant to support a full range of today’s digital transactions and include a standardized foundation for most deal types, which will make it easier to transact efficiently. More business-specific terms will be addressed in a separate addendum, which will be customized to each transaction type, developed in parallel by IAB’s Terms & Conditions Task Force.

Eng said IAB is currently working on various different forms of addendums that will be released over the next few years, and noted that it will focus more on financial and legal obligations. She added that they will also be looking at direct buys, programmatic guarantees, private marketplace deals, sponsorship contracts, and other topics.

According to Eng, there will be another draft for direct buys that will come out in the next few months, which can be released either at the end of the year or early next year.

“These are core terms that are your foundational set of terms, and then we are going to have those various different agendas that we’ve listed in the cover page on various different scenarios,” Eng said.

IAB is inviting all industry stakeholders to review and comment on the new general terms by July 21, 2025. Feedback is expected to shape the final version, which IAB anticipates will be a new foundation for digital advertising agreements within the industry.

“An update to T&Cs is long overdue, and I’m glad to see this coming out of IAB,” Christy Loftus, svp, data logistics, Canvas Worldwide, said in a statement. “Standardizing how we approach advertising agreements allows for greater consistency and gives the industry a baseline on the expectations for all sides of media.”

Rob Wheeler, until recently the chief marketing officer of GroupM, launched a new media venture on Tuesday called At The Moment (ATM).

The bootstrapped start-up will cover the intersection of advertising, technology, and media—the acronym ATM also refers to its scope of coverage—although it will not be a traditional journalistic enterprise.

Instead, the video-centric outlet will aim to occupy a middle ground between traditional journalism and brand marketing, spotlighting the trends, figures, and storylines driving the advertising industry.

“I wanted to make something whose content is interesting but that is also collaborative with companies,” Wheeler said. “I think people will be able to learn from this, and I think we can help champion the successes of the industry.”

Media veteran and former colleague Christine Rader will be the only other full-time employee, although ATM will be supported by a cast of freelance production staff. Wheeler declined to offer financial projections or further comment on commercial details for the operation.

The venture is the latest in a growing series of media startups that aim to parlay the expertise and relationships of their founders into lightweight, sustainable operations.

Similar to Beet TV or Marketecture, ATM does not aim to break stories or push for accountability; instead, it offers a thought leadership platform for industry experts to share their perspectives and analyses. In giving their founders an independent forum for broadcasting content, these outlets mirror the broader trend of solo entrepreneurship that is reshaping the news media landscape.

A focus on video and newsletters

ATM will focus primarily on video, which will live as four different franchises at first.

Moment Makers will feature one-on-one interviews with industry figures speaking directly to the camera. Collective Moments will showcase roundtable discussions that have been edited for conciseness.

Inside Moments, a longer-form production, will employ B-roll footage and explore how a product has come to life. And Moments That Matter will highlight major industry events, like the upfronts or Cannes Lions, in the form of a short sizzle reel.

The publisher will also have a newsletter, called Your ATM Withdrawal, available at launch, which will publish two to three times a week, according to Wheeler.

To monetize the operation, ATM will rely primarily on brand partnerships. Wheeler said ATM will sometimes produce unpaid content—such as a recent video capturing Disney’s upfront—but for the most part, content will have an affiliated brand.

In the future, ATM aims to cover other industries, such as automotive or consumer packaged goods. The model would be the same—the videos would just feature different executives.

“I just want to be part of the conversation and create moments,” said Wheeler. “I’ll be happy when people are coming to us asking us to get involved.”

Advertisers curious about whether to spend billions on TV commercials this year need to figure out what frightens them more — is it a fear of the unknown or a fear of missing out?

Madison Avenue is grappling with a host of question marks in the early part of 2025, and advertisers’ decisions will have a strong effect on the media industry’s annual “upfront” market, when U.S. media companies ranging from Amazon to Paramount Global try to sell the bulk of their advertising inventory.

Marketers try to line up their budgets in advance of this annual haggle, but so far, doing so is tough. It’s unclear whether President Trump’s economic policies and tariffs will dampen consumer demand. At the same time, TV networks only have so much ad space in must-buy big-audience properties like NFL games, award shows, and “Saturday Night Live.” Miss out now, and there may not be a chance to snag spots later.

Popular on Variety

But while it’s easy to think of ESPN as watching, because that’s our legacy, we’re actually

“The only thing that is certain right now is that everyone had a plan coming out of Q4 and Q1. There was a sense of optimism,” says Ryan Gould, co-president of U.S. ad sales at Warner Bros Discovery. “Those plans have been scrapped, and everyone is in wait-and-see mode.”

Billions of dollars hinge on advertisers’ sense of the national mood. Ad commitments in last year’s “upfront” for primetime broadcast TV fell 3.5% to $9.34 billion, according to Media Dynamics Inc., while commitments for primetime on cable tumbled 4.8%, to $9.065 billion. The diminishing dollars put a spotlight on a media industry that is changing quickly as more people gravitate to streaming video and other means of accessing their favorite programs, movies, news and sports events.

Indeed, ad commitments to streaming video hubs rose a noticeable 35.3%, hiking to $11.1 billion from $8.2 billion in 2023’s market. The amount committed to streaming video was greater than that devoted to primetime broadcast or primetime cable — a first for the industry.

Projections for this year’s market have become difficult. Marketers “are all grappling with a landscape that is defined by tariff fluctuations,” says John Halley, president of advertising at Paramount.

Some media buyers project a downturn. Auto advertisers are seen having a tough time trying to figure out how to sell both electric and traditional vehicles, and retailers, restauranteurs and others are all waiting for more concrete signs of how the economy will move. There are also questions about how tariffs and Trump policies might affect one of TV’s biggest supporters, the pharmaceutical industry.

Still, bright spots remain. Advertisers seem eager to tie pitches and promotions to programs seen by a broader audience. “A lot of the growth we are projecting is in streaming and the NFL,” says one buying executive. “Without that, it would be a lot worse.”

TV networks may have new leverage in negotiations. Executives on both sides of the bargaining table acknowledge that downward pressure on streaming ad rates — spurred largely by a glut of new inventory coming into the market from Amazon Prime Video and Netflix — won’t be as severe as last year. And many are even expecting an uptick in ad rates (also known as CPMs and reflecting the cost of reaching 1,000 viewers) tied to linear cable and broadcast. “There is still more demand in linear broadcast than there are impressions to buy,” says Rita Ferro, president of sales for Disney Advertising

Some sellers are looking past the fog. After all, the last several upfronts have been mired by the coronavirus pandemic, supply-chain issues, inflation and fears of a recession. “It doesn’t feel that different than the past five years of having some question mark in the macroeconomic environment,” says Mark Marshall, NBCU’s chairman of advertising and partnerships.

Sports are likely to play a key factor in these annual deliberations. NBCUniversal and Amazon have already gone to market to sell ad packages tied to their new NBA rights deals, which kick in this fall. NBC has also been actively spotlighting time for its 2026 broadcast of Super Bowl LX. The company may feel some pressure to lock up sports deals in the current environment. NBC will turn over two nights of its schedule for part of the year to NBA games, betting that the matches can lure bigger dollars and rate gains than traditional entertainment. The company next February will have hours of Winter Olympics, Super Bowl and NBA All-Star inventory to fill as well, meaning it needs to win support for programming that typically commands higher prices.

How to sell off the stuff that doesn’t feature athletes or live spectacle? Give the buyers what they want.

In a tricky moment, advertisers want to be able to move their commitments around to match the tone of the times, executives agree. Such requests may include delaying ad spending, or shifting dollars from linear to streaming, or vice versa. “Yes, they probably need flexibility,” says Donna Speciale, president of U.S. advertising sales and marketing at TelevisaUnivision.

There are signs that some of the handwringing over the economy may also be overwrought. Several media companies have noted that so-called “scatter” advertising, purchased closer to airtime than inventory in the upfront, has held up well. At Disney, executives “are not seeing any pullback in March or April,” says Ferro. If advertisers truly need something in particular, says Speciale, they won’t. “I don’t see anyone scaling back in the areas that drive growth for them,” she says.

TV networks will have to hope strong recent activity is a strong indicator, but many acknowledge they will have to be willing to pivot so advertisers can react to whatever economic surprises might surface. Disney’s Ferro hopes clients will come to the table, rather than keeping money locked away in the bank.  “Sitting on the sidelines and not having a plan isn’t going to work,” she says.

While economic uncertainty created by President Donald Trump’s tariffs is looming large over the 2025-26 upfront season, Spanish-language network executives say the White House’s trade policy has yet to prompt a pullback in spending, while citing the unique niche they occupy in the media marketplace.

The two main competitors, TelevisaUnivision and Comcast-owned Telemundo, both saw revenue decline during the first quarter, as they head into an upfront that, beyond the challenges facing linear TV, has been roiled by the uncertainty tariffs have brought to the larger economy.

Donna Speciale, whose going into her fifth upfront presentation as TelevisaUnivision’s president of ad sales and marketing, has brought in over 300 new clients during her tenure, including more than 125 this year alone, making up $500 million in new business.

“Clients definitely are being more cautious and asking about flexibility, but the return on investment they get on the Hispanic audience is so exponential that this is not an area they’re pulling back on,” “Speciale told TheWrap.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK – MAY 14: Donna Speciale attends the 2024 TelevisaUnivision Upfront at HK Hall on May 14, 2024 in New York City. (Photo by John Nacion/Getty Images)

Though its content is not directly impacted by tariffs, TelevisaUnivision is exposed to tariffs through foreign exchange rates with Mexico and advertising.

In the first quarter, TelevisaUnivision’s U.S. ad revenue fell 11% to $354 million, primarily due to softness in linear from the absence of the prior year’s broadcast of the Super Bowl. Mexico — which makes up 25% of its total ad revenue — fell 16% to $209.4 million but grew 1% in local currency from strong private sector ad sales and demand for entertainment and sports content, including Juego de Voces, Liga MX and the Super Bowl.

Rafael Urbina, chief operating officer of TelevisaUnivision’s ViX streaming service, said it’s too early to tell what the impact on its content production will be, but that it’s prepared to shift its production capabilities from Mexico to the U.S. if needed. CEO Daniel Allegre has also said the company would look to reduce costs to mitigate the impact of tariffs.

“I don’t think it’s time to hit the panic button for anyone,” Urbina added. “We produce a ton of content in the U.S., and we’ll adjust to the changing rules for the game.”

President Donald Trump holds his Make America Wealthy Again rally on April 2. (Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump holds his Make America Wealthy Again rally on April 2. (Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Meanwhile, Telemundo’s ad sales are included in the larger NBCUniversal portfolio, which makes up Comcast’s media segment.

The unit reported a 7% drop in domestic advertising revenue to $1.9 billion during the first quarter of 2025, primarily due to lower revenue at linear networks from sports content volume and timing and tough political comparisons only partially offset by an increase at Peacock.

“We can’t predict the market and what the market will do,” NBCU’s president of advertising partnerships Alison Levin told TheWrap when asked about tariffs. “We are focused every day on consumer behavior and categories that we’re watching closely, but we are really focused on what we can control.”

The power of live

Spanish-language networks are going all in on live content and sports.

In the 2025-26 season, 70% of Telemundo’s content, or roughly 5,000 hours worth of programming, will be live, including Miss Universe, Noticias Telemundo, Billboard’s Latin Music Awards and the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

“Soccer is now considered to be the fastest growing team sport in America. We see 400% growth in fandom. The audience that Telemundo serves is innately connected to this,” Telemundo Enterprises chief administration and marketing officer Monica Gil told TheWrap.

Liga MX
Henry Martin of America celebrates with the trophy after the final second leg match between Monterrey and America as part of the Torneo Apertura 2024 Liga MX. (Photo by Hector Vivas/Getty Images)

TelevisaUnivision has also expanded its soccer rights with CONCACAF, adding theWomen’s Championship, Women’s Gold Cup, Nations League, and Champions Cup to its portfolio.

Meanwhile, ViX is leaning more toward unscripted formats for both linear and streaming, as well as content geared towards Latin music and artists through ViX Musica. It will also lean into its mobile app with short-form content, such as sports, news and entertainment highlights, and video podcasts showcasing Hispanic podcasters and creators.

Additionally, the streamer is planning to launch 50 to 100 minute-long episodes for vertical video, dubbed “micro series.” Around 40 will roll out in the back half of 2025, starting with dramas, before expanding to comedies and documentaries.

The Hispanic opportunity

Unlike most of the major networks, TelevisaUnivision and Telemundo are also touting their distinct advantage with Hispanic audiences.

Per Nielsen, Hispanic audiences spend an average of 25 hours per week watching TV, including nearly 14 hours on connected TV devices, and make up nearly 50% of all streaming viewership. U.S. Hispanics make up 19.5% of the population and represent over $4 trillion of gross domestic product (GDP) and over $1.9 trillion in annual spending.

“Hispanics are supercharging the economy. They are driving the demand. They’re deciding on trillions of dollars that are spent,” Gil said. “So we’re no longer a market niche. We’re really positioned to influence the growth of any business for years.”

Telemundo ranks as the No. 1 Spanish-language broadcast network with 962,000 total viewers in the first quarter of 2025 and had 12.9 million average monthly digital users for the period. Meanwhile, TelevisaUnivision, which invests almost $2 billion in Spanish-language content annually for streaming and linear, reaches a total of 28 million digital video viewers, a 60% year over year increase, and has surpassed 50 million monthly active users on ViX.

ViX, which is available standalone and in bundles with pay TV operators like Spectrum and DirecTV, offers a free tier, a $4.99 per month ad-supported premium tier and an $8.99 per month ad-free premium tier.

“We’re happy to take a lower subscription fee for the potential incremental output that we can deliver through advertising,” Urbina said, noting that the ad-supported premium tier has become the fastest-growing part of its business.

Speciale acknowledged that the flood of inventory from Amazon and Netflix resulted in a decrease in its cost per thousand impressions (CPMs) during last year’s upfront, but expects that pressure will eventually level off. “There is definitely a lot more inventory, but given we have a huge unique proposition, we’re in our own ecosystem,” she said.

Brand execs are always blind-sided when ad campaigns blow up in their faces, but the pain is usually self-inflicted. What’s a Chief Marketing Officer to do?

As if Nike didn’t have enough problems (sales slump, stale designs, unfocused branding, executive shakeup), the company recently found itself on center stage in one of those increasingly frequent cultural sideshows that masquerade as news.

In Nike’s case, the culprit was a branded slogan that appeared prominently on giant billboards during a recent marathon in London. In bold black letters on a solid field of deep red—“Never Again,” on the top line and “Until Next Year” on the bottom.

It was part of a campaign by Nike to populate the race route with inspiring messages. Hardcore marathon runners often gasp as they collapse across the finish line: “I’m never doing that again.” But a year later they’re back to try again. Some runners got the joke but most and many others did not.

To many people, “never again” is better known as a reference to the Holocaust.

To them, Nike’s message was unclear or tone deaf.

A broadcast journalist writing for the British magazine The Spectator called the use of it in a commercial ad “a disgrace.” The billboards disappeared, Nike apologized, and a major marketing investment went down the drain. It would appear the company was so focused on its athletic customers that it couldn’t see what non-runners saw.

Nike is the latest in a growing list of major brands that have been stung by marketing flops that “seemed like a good idea at the time.” One of the lesser-known legends of botched branding was an expensive, edgy ad campaign for Diet Coke in 2014. The target audience was young professionals in Silicon Valley and New York City. In a TED Talk, graphic designer Chip Kidd showed pictures of the company’s big launch. Coke bought all the ad space in one of New York’s busiest subway stations. All in one night, the walls were plastered with huge signs that read: “You moved to New York with the clothes on your back, the cash in your pocket and your eyes on the prize. You’re on. Coke.”

But the way the graphics were arranged, the tagline appeared to read, “You’re on Coke.”

Tunnel vision. As a retail industry consultant I see this up close and all too frequently.

The public relations dustups at Nike, Coke and many others are symptoms of a much bigger problem—when brands lose their way and need to recapture the spotlight, stress sets in and mistakes are made. It seems pretty simple to think of engaging consumers as a model to see more broadly, skip tunnel vision and look around a corner or two.

In a season of uncertainty, the retail industry will be watching closely to see if one or both—or neither—can steer through some difficult and necessary turns.

Did Elmo get sacked as a result of President Trump’s attempts to defund public media?

A LinkedIn post purportedly written by the lovable red Muppet — in which Elmo says he “was recently laid off because of the federal budget cuts” — has gone viral on social media. A May 7 post by a user on X about Elmo’s alleged layoff notice already has more than 2 million views.

But as you might suspect, the supposed Elmo post did not originate from Sesame Workshop, the not-for-profit company that produces “Sesame Street.” The post appears to have come from an unverified “Elmo from Sesame Street” account that is no longer available on LinkedIn.

A Sesame Workshop spokesperson confirmed to Variety that the post was not from a Sesame Workshop account and that it was taken down by LinkedIn.

In the fake post, according to the version circulating online, “Elmo” wrote: “Hi LinkedIn, Unfortunately Elmo was recently laid off because of the federal budget cuts. Elmo worked at Sesame Street for 45 years. Elmo is sad. Elmo loved his time at Sesame Street.”

The post continued, “Elmo is going to miss his friends Big Bird, Cookie Monster, Ernie, Bert, Abby, Grover, Count and so many more. They made Elmo’s day so much better. Elmo is looking for his next opportunity. Elmo is good at so many things. Like hugs. Elmo LOVES giving hugs. Elmo can also recognize the letter E, spell his name, feel empathy, sing ‘Elmo’s Song’ and ask how you are doing. Elmo is open to full-time or freelance roles.”

The “Elmo” post on LinkedIn also said that “if you want to help Elmo and his friends, please urge your local congress person to save Public Media.”

Trump last week issued an executive order to block all federal funding to PBS and NPR, alleging they have produced “biased and partisan news coverage.” In response, PBS president and CEO Paula Kerger said in a statement, “The President’s blatantly unlawful Executive Order, issued in the middle of the night, threatens our ability to serve the American public with educational programming, as we have for the past 50-plus years. We are currently exploring all options to allow PBS to continue to serve our member stations and all Americans.”

Elmo has been a figure in the effort by conservative to cut off public media funding. At a congressional hearing called by House Republicans in March, Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) said that “instead of a serious hearing, we’re here to attack NPR and PBS.”

During his questioning, Garcia evoked Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s efforts in the 1940s and ’50s to root out suspected Communists in the U.S. government. Garcia asked Kerger, who had been called to testify before the House of Representative’s Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) subcommittee: “The American people want to know: Is Elmo now, or has he ever been, a member of the Communist Party of the United States? A yes or no.”

Kerger, chuckling, responded, “No.” Garcia followed up with, “Are you sure, Ms. Kerger? Because he’s obviously red.” Said Kerger, “Well, he is a puppet, but no.” Garcia also asked if Cookie Monster was “silencing pro-cookie voters,” to which Kerger said, “Cookies are sometimes food.”

Commenting on the issue of federal funding for public media, Sesame Workshop said in a statement, “Sesame Workshop and PBS have a shared commitment to using the power of public television to bring critical early learning to children across the country. For more than half a century, we have been proud to partner with them to bring ‘Sesame Street’s’ beloved characters and research-based curriculum to families nationwide. We remain firmly in support of the vital public investment that allows PBS to continue this important work.”

The Scoop

As the sprawling public relations industry scrambles to figure out how to buffer its clients’ brands and reputations through the new medium of artificial intelligence chatbots, some firms have reached a surprising conclusion: The best way to get your client’s message into the output of ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and the rest is by talking to journalists.

Firms, whose services now often include regularly testing clients’ reputations with AI models, are finding that authoritative publications — including declining local news outlets and specialist trade journals — shape the results of chatbot queries about a given company far more powerfully than a social media campaign or Reddit thread could. The result is a striking reversal of the status quo at a moment when PR executives had begun to enjoy the social media-era option of ignoring journalists entirely.

“Earned media still matters, but not the way people think,” said Carreen Winters, who leads the reputation practice at MikeWorldWide, using the trade term for independent reporting.

The firm is launching a service this week called “PreBunk” that’s designed, according to a draft press release shared with Semafor, to provide an “ongoing proactive ‘education’ of the LLMs about your company and its reputation.”

Consumers, according to Winters, say, “I’m not going to trust earned media — I’m going to trust the internet.” But these LLMs’ sources lead back to journalism, something she said can sometimes be a hard sell to executives who thought they no longer had to deal with pesky reporters.

“Sometimes it’s a small trade publication that your client has said, ‘Nobody reads that anymore,‘” she said. “Sometimes it’s a hometown newspaper.”

Other firms are reaching similar conclusions. “Earned media and owned content [that is, pages on a company’s own website] are the primary drivers of how GenAI platforms recommend and describe brands and products. It’s not even close,” said Brian Buchwald, who leads Edelman’s global product, data and AI strategy. He said the firm carefully tracks the sources of LLM answers, which vary widely based on industry and brand. LLMs’ assessments of an enterprise tech company’s reputation, for instance, drew from Wall Street Journal coverage and research reports from Gartner.

“You can make a big difference very quickly with the right content and campaign choices and who writes about it,” he said.

Rand Fishkin, the founder of the audience research firm SparkToro, wrote last year that, for instance, LLMs appear to rely heavily on professional review sites like Eater when recommending restaurants. For brands looking to stand out, “that’s gonna be a PR process and a pitch process, but is it worthwhile? Absolutely,” he wrote.

He recently headlined another post: “Unpopular Opinion: Public Relations is the Future of Marketing.”

Know More

The PR industry is navigating the rise of AI in parallel with the overlapping but more technical SEO trade, which is adjusting its sights from bringing clients’ websites up search results to elevating them in AI excerpts on Google and elsewhere. One place they converge is in encouraging companies to add pages to their website aimed at LLM, not human, consumers.

 

The SEO professionals are finding, however, that for now AI is largely relying on the same rankings that search engines use — though sometimes in unpredictable ways. A brief from the enterprise SEO marketing company BrightEdge, for instance, cites as “one of the most important discoveries” about Anthropic’s Claude the fact that it relies on the lesser-used search engine Brave for its rankings; companies will need to ensure they’re being indexed by Brave to feed their official line to Claude. Another brief wrestles with the subtle differences between Google’s AI Overviews and more traditional search rankings, with the LLMs answering “anticipated questions,” not just the ones consumers are asking.

The SEO field has long been engaged in a game of cat-and-mouse with Google and other search products, and spokespeople for LLM companies didn’t respond to inquiries about how they view these efforts.

Ben’s view

There’s something heartening, from the perspective of the humans in the media business, about the practice of gaming digital media becoming less technical, after a long march in which advertising and marketing were essentially swallowed by adtech and practices like SEO.

Dealing with LLMs is “more like traditional PR than it is like SEO,” Ben Worthen, a former Wall Street Journal reporter who founded the agency Message Lab, told me.

That’s good news, in particular, for the PR industry, which gainfully employs its share of human beings, as well as some former journalists.

But even if the LLMs find this kind of authoritative journalism valuable, and even if companies will pay to employ publicists to pitch their stories, it’s not clear where that process meets news organizations’ business models.

For instance: What, exactly, is a trade publication that offers valuable and authoritative service to LLMs even as humans stop reading it? A research service for AI? If the handful of firms training and maintaining LLMs really think that the authoritative reporting on small industries or local areas is valuable, they may have to pay for it — becuase nobody else seems to want to.

Room for Disagreement

The darkest warnings about the power of AI have to do with the “liar’s dividend” that renders accurate journalism pointless. The theory is not that deepfakes will persuade people to believe anything in particular, but that they’ll make people disbelieve everything. Bobby Chesney and Danielle Citron coined the term in a 2019 essay arguing that “a skeptical public will be primed to doubt the authenticity of real audio and video evidence. This skepticism can be invoked just as well against authentic as against adulterated content.”

Notable

  • AI relies on original journalism, a Brookings Institution report argued: “Without access to human-created, high-quality content that is a relatively accurate portrayal of reality — and that journalism provides — the foundational models that fuel machine learning and generative AI applications of all types will malfunction, degrade, and potentially even collapse, putting the entire system at risk.”
  • Or, as Joshua Rothman put it in a relatively optimistic New Yorker essay, “A.I. could improve the news — if it doesn’t destroy it in the process.”
  • The AI effect on search is here, as searches in Safari recently fell for the first time ever, according to an Apple executive.